Broker- Dealer Law Corner

Broker- Dealer Law Corner

Category Archives: Rule 2010

Subscribe to Rule 2010 RSS Feed

FINRA’s Board Continues To Bend In the Wind Of Criticisim

Posted in Arbitration, Board of Governors, Enforcement, FINRA, PIABA, Registered Representative, Rogue rep, Rule 2010, Sanctions
On Wednesday, the FINRA Board met and discussed two topics that I recently blogged about: recidivist brokers and unpaid arbitration awards.  In predictable fashion, FINRA withered in the face of criticism that its existing rules and policies are somehow not tough enough on its member firms, and embarked on a proposed series of steps that,… Continue Reading

Sticks And Stones May Break Your Bones, But Words Will Get You Barred

Posted in Enforcement, FINRA, Registered Representative, Rule 2010, Sanctions
I have been meaning to write something about this recent NAC decision for a while now, but I am still not really sure what to make of it.  I suppose it stands for two propositions.  First, there is almost nothing that a registered rep can do without FINRA sticking its nose in, regardless of whether… Continue Reading

Frequently Asked Questions About FINRA Rule 8210

Posted in Disciplinary Process, Enforcement, Examination, FINRA, Rule 2010, Rule 8210, Sanctions
As readers of this Blog know, Rule 8210 is a favorite subject of mine to complain about, particularly the frightening vigor with which FINRA constantly tests the limits of the rule.  What follows are some very helpful FAQs about Rule 8210 from Michael Gross.  –  Alan The Scope of the Rule Can FINRA really ask… Continue Reading

The Long Arm Of The Law Has Nothing On FINRA’s Reach

Posted in Disciplinary Process, Enforcement, Examination, FINRA, Registered Representative, Rule 2010
So, you’re a registered rep, working for a broker-dealer. Necessarily, you are registered with and subject to the oversight of FINRA, not a particularly happy proposition.  But at least you can take comfort in the fact that while FINRA may have the right to stick its nose into your securities business, what you do away… Continue Reading

FINRA’S Ability To Enforce Securities Act Violations Subject To Compelling Court Challenge

Posted in Disciplinary Process, Enforcement, FINRA, Rule 2010
Last week, word spread about a legal challenge that has been mounted in federal court against FINRA’s ability to enforce violations of the Securities Act of 1933, and, perhaps not surprisingly, it has generated a lot of talk, not to mention enthusiasm (at least among those who chafe at FINRA’s aggressive Enforcement mentality). The specifics of… Continue Reading

PIABA Cries Wolf, Again, To Ensure That Its Lawyers Get Paid

Posted in Arbitration, FINRA, PIABA, Rule 2010
Once again, I found myself gritting my teeth in frustration after reading yet another PIABA report complaining about some perceived inequity in the FINRA arbitration process that cuts against customers. This week, PIABA released its study demonstrating that sometimes when claimants prevail in arbitrations against broker-dealers, the BD that lost is unable to pay the… Continue Reading
.