I am hardly saying that SEC Regulation S-P is the sexiest of regulations. I mean, has any customer is history actually read one of those exciting statement stuffers that discloses in some dense font a BD’s privacy policy? Likely not, but, nevertheless, it remains that in this day and age, with hacking and phishing and
UB Greensfelder
Is FINRA’s New Regulatory Notice On Departing Reps A Unicorn?
By UB Greensfelder on
FINRA came out with a slightly weird Regulatory Notice last week. In a succinct document, barely over two pages, FINRA addressed something that may, or may not, actually be of concern to anyone. In short, Regulatory Notice 19-10 states FINRA’s position on what a broker-dealer is supposed to tell the customers of a registered representative…
Wedbush Learns That It’s Not Enough Just To Spot Red Flags
By UB Greensfelder on
Posted in SEC, Supervision
I have been busy the last month getting ready for a big arbitration, and attending the first week of what looks like is going to be a four- or five-week slog when all is said and done. So, I am just catching up on some recent developments, and mulling over what might be of interest…
FINRA Says, Proof? We Don’t Need Your Stinkin’ Proof
By UB Greensfelder on
If you are a regular reader of this blog, then you know that over my last few posts, I have been talking about an increasingly visible effort by FINRA to turn its regulatory eye from rogue brokers – who have been an irritant to FINRA and NASD for decades – to rogue firms (my term,…
FINRA Is Going After “High-Risk” Firms, But First Has To Invent The Definition Of High-Risk
By UB Greensfelder on
I told you two weeks ago in my blog post that this would happen. I told you that when Robert Cook announced the topics to be taken up at the February/March FINRA Board meeting in Boca Raton, he slipped and used the new phrase “high-risk firms.” Well, in yesterday’s announcement about what actually took place…
FINRA Coins A Scary New Term: “High-Risk Firms”
By UB Greensfelder on
Yesterday, FINRA sent a seemingly innocuous memo to member firms giving a brief outline of the subjects that its Board will take up at its meeting this week in sunny Boca Raton, Florida. (Wait, the Board isn’t meeting in Washington, as it normally does, but, rather, in south Florida? Oh, right, it’s February. Much better…
INSIGHT: Protecting Broker Dealers From Cyber Threats
By UB Greensfelder on
Posted in Cybersecurity, FINRA
Yesterday, two of my colleagues here at Ulmer, Fran Goins and Michael Hoenig, published an article in @BLaw Insight in response to a recent report by FINRA outlining the best practices for BDs to deal with cyber threats. Since this is undoubtedly a subject of considerable interest to many of you, I wanted to share…
Contrary To What FINRA Believes, Rule 8210 Is Not A Search Warrant
By UB Greensfelder on
I have been waiting for a while to write about this issue, since it arose in an Enforcement case I handled for a client, and I wanted the matter to run its full course at FINRA before I started throwing stones. Sadly, there are so many things I could complain about here. The fact that…
Does FINRA Have Jurisdiction Over Me?
By UB Greensfelder on
Posted in Arbitration, FINRA
Does FINRA have jurisdiction over me? This is a question that I regularly field at the outset of regulatory engagements. My answer differs depending on a number of factors, including the nature of a person’s role and duties at a firm, his or her registration status, when the alleged misconduct occurred, whether he or she…
The Securities Regulators All Have Senior-itis. Maybe For Good Reason.
By UB Greensfelder on
The securities industry’s concern over the aging of the U.S. population, specifically, aging investors, has, apparently, reached a fever pitch. Yesterday in New York, SIFMA hosted its “Senior Investor Protection Conference – One Year Later: FINRA Rules 2165 and 4512,” and, for a securities conference, it received pretty extensive news coverage. I saw at least…