As a former member of FINRA Enforcement’s Litigation Department and a current practitioner in FINRA regulatory matters, I have read my fair share of decisions from the Office of Hearing Officers (OHO). I recently read the Southeast Investments/Black decision, which was issued in March. There is some good stuff in there – from an entertainment
FINRA
When FINRA Can’t Discipline The Firm, Individuals Pay The Price
By UB Greensfelder on
There has been a lot of discussion over the past few years, including in this blog, about the growing – and troubling – trend for Chief Compliance Officers to be named as respondents in disciplinary actions. While regulators regularly deny that they truly have it out for CCOs, as is often the case, their…
FINRA’s New Rules On Seniors: Let’s Protect Them From Their Own Bad Decisions?
By UB Greensfelder on
We have written before about senior investors, but I saw a couple of things in the last couple of weeks that suggests this subject needs to be revisited.
First, back in February, the SEC got around to passing FINRA’s proposed rules to protect senior investors, including both new Rule 2165 and amendments to existing Rule…
FINRA OTRs: Preparation Is The Key
By UB Greensfelder on
Last week, I published a post about the benefits of “lawyering up” when dealing with FINRA, particularly to handle the defense of an OTR. Here, my partner Michael Gross, who, like me, is a former FINRA Enforcement attorney, offers his advice about how properly to prepare for an OTR. While this post is helpful, it…
Puerto Rico Customer Arbitrations: The Untold Story About Why So Many Settle
By Chris Seps on
Here is a piece from Chris Seps, who has a bit of a reputation around here for being angry. Judge for yourself. But, for what it’s worth, I do want to say that I have had the pleasure of being involved in several cases in which the subject of this post, Dr. Craig McCann, appeared…
It Can Pay To “Lawyer Up” When Dealing With FINRA
By UB Greensfelder on
Posted in Defenses, Disciplinary Process, Enforcement, Examination, FINRA, OTR, Registered Representative, Sanctions
I realize that the title of this blog post may sound self-serving, so I apologize for that up front, as it is not my intent. Still, there is a lesson here to be learned.
I got a phone call yesterday from a reporter asking me to comment on a disciplinary action that FINRA had just…
Is There A Catch-22 To Fighting FINRA Charges?
By UB Greensfelder on
Here is a fascinating analysis by my partner, Michael Gross, of FINRA’s twisted logic when it comes to sanctions: your very decision not to admit liability and to put FINRA to its proof can, and will, be held against you when it comes time to determine the appropriate sanctions. Or will it? – Alan
The…
FINRA Is Going Rogue…Again
By UB Greensfelder on
I read an article this week bemoaning the fact that “rogue brokers” – a term that is commonly used but steadfastly undefined – apparently remain rampant in the securities industry. Anyone that has read FINRA’s 2017 Exam Priorities Letter knows that this is one of the issues on which FINRA intends to focus its regulatory…
Is FINRA Guilty Of Gaslighting Us When Its CEO Says Things Will Be Different?
By UB Greensfelder on
Posted in FINRA
Since the presidential election, heck, since the campaign, my friends and family will readily attest that my new favorite word is “gaslighting.” According to Wikipedia, it is “is a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or group, hoping to make the target question their own memory, perception,…
FINRA Releases Its 2017 Exam Priorities: No More “Culture Of Compliance” References, Plus The List Of Usual Suspects
By UB Greensfelder on
In the blog I posted yesterday, I discussed a late Xmas present that the 10th Circuit gave everyone who is subject to the SEC’s jurisdiction. Today, let’s talk about FINRA’s New Year’s gift to its member firms: the annual Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter, which was released this week. As is typically the…