Broker- Dealer Law Corner

Broker- Dealer Law Corner

Tag Archives: broker-dealer

Dog Bites Man: FINRA’s Proposed Amendments To Code Of Arbitration Procedure Put Customers’ Interests Ahead Of Members’

Posted in Arbitration, FINRA, PIABA
In December, Ulmer & Berne is hosting four financial services webcasts, the first of which I will be presenting along with my partner, Michael Gross:  FINRA 2019: A Look Back, and Thoughts About What Lies Ahead (Wednesday, December 04, 2019, 2:00 PM EST).  The others are The Anatomy of a Whistleblower Action: Procedure, Practice Pointers,… Continue Reading

PIABA’s Anti-Expungement Tirade Is Predictably Short On Facts

Posted in Arbitration, Expungement, FINRA, PIABA, Uncategorized
Here is how PIABA’s one-track mind operates: in a Report it just issued, PIABA laments the frequency with which registered reps are able to get customer complaints expunged from their records. The sole reason for this, PIABA concludes, is that the expungement process is broken, and/or is being gamed by brokers. It does not even enter… Continue Reading

“The Opinions Offered Today Are Mine Alone And Do Not Represent The Commission” — A Summary Of Recent Remarks From SEC And CFTC Officials

Posted in CFTC, SEC
Selflessly, Blaine Doyle recently attended a presentation here in Chicago by the SEC and CFTC, so you didn’t have to do it yourself.  Here is his recount of the highlights. – Alan Anyone who has sat through a talk by financial regulators is undoubtedly familiar with the refrain from the individuals that they do not… Continue Reading

All-Public Arbitration Panels Are Paying Out Money At An Unprecedented Rate…Just As PIABA Intended

Posted in Arbitration, FINRA, PIABA
I read an article this week in Investment News with the following headline: “Brokerage Customers Winning More FINRA Arbitration Cases.” As a guy who defends customer cases, I was naturally intriguied by this. According to the article, “brokerage customers who do file claims against their registered representative or firm are faring better in the process… Continue Reading

A Glaring Example Of FINRA Dragging Its Feet, Culminating In A Pointless Default Decision

Posted in Disciplinary Process, Enforcement, Examination, FINRA
FINRA loves to tout its supposed intent to bring meaningful cases, cases that matter to the investing public, rather than enforcing “foot faults,” as it has been accused of doing over the years. My own experience with FINRA suggests that while it talks a big game, in reality, we all still live in foot-fault city.… Continue Reading

FINRA Touts The Fact That Its Examinations Need Not Be “Fair”

Posted in Disciplinary Process, Enforcement, Examination, FINRA
While I feel I have enjoyed as much success defending respondents in FINRA Enforcement matters as anyone, I am still careful to caution clients who are unwilling to consider any settlement that going toe-to-toe with FINRA at a hearing is always a difficult proposition, even though they are presumed innocent and FINRA bears the burden… Continue Reading

FINRA Proposes To Dispense With Due Process, All Because It’s Failed To Do Its Job Of Policing The Markets

Posted in Disciplinary Process, FINRA, High-Risk firms
Reading Reg Notice 19-17 makes me think of the legal arguments that I’ve recently read regarding whether a president can be found guilty of obstructing justice if the actions in question were taken out in the open, for everyone to see. Here, FINRA’s proposed power grab is simply outrageous, but, you got to give them… Continue Reading

FINRA AWC Includes Waiver Of A Fine: Is This A Sign Of Good Things To Come?

Posted in Disciplinary Process, Enforcement, FINRA, Sanctions
Way back in 2006, NASD issued Notice to Members 06-55, which tweaked the Sanction Guidelines to allow not just the size of the firm to be taken into consideration when determining the appropriate sanctions to be meted out, but, more importantly, how well, or how poorly, the firm is doing on its income statement. Specifically,… Continue Reading

Is FINRA’s New Regulatory Notice On Departing Reps A Unicorn?

Posted in Disclosure, FINRA, Registered Representative
FINRA came out with a slightly weird Regulatory Notice last week. In a succinct document, barely over two pages, FINRA addressed something that may, or may not, actually be of concern to anyone. In short, Regulatory Notice 19-10 states FINRA’s position on what a broker-dealer is supposed to tell the customers of a registered representative… Continue Reading

FINRA Is Going After “High-Risk” Firms, But First Has To Invent The Definition Of High-Risk

Posted in FINRA, heightened supervision, High-Risk firms, Rogue rep
I told you two weeks ago in my blog post that this would happen. I told you that when Robert Cook announced the topics to be taken up at the February/March FINRA Board meeting in Boca Raton, he slipped and used the new phrase “high-risk firms.” Well, in yesterday’s announcement about what actually took place… Continue Reading

Hope Springs Eternal

Posted in Administrative Proceedings, NCLA, SEC
My partner, Ken Berg, writes about his recent meeting with the NCLA, a group that anyone who has an administrative practice should be familiar with.  –  Alan I had the privilege of being invited to attend in Washington, D.C., on February 28, 2019, the inaugural panel discussion hosted by a relatively new nonprofit civil rights… Continue Reading
.