Right after I posted this, FINRA announced a third AML settlement, this time with Interactive Brokers. It was no small deal: it came with a $15 million fine and an obligation to retain an independent consultant. (In addition to the FINRA AWC, Interactive simultaneously entered into settlements with the SEC — with another $11.5
Enforcement
FINRA ♥ Rule 8210
By Alan Wolper on
I hope that you have had the chance to enjoy Jessica Hopper’s paean to Rule 8210 in her recent blog posted on FINRA’s website. Very disturbing, and for all the old reasons.
First, once again, she starts by patting herself – well, not just herself, I guess, but Enforcement generally – on the back for…
For FINRA, Restitution Is The Solution
By Alan Wolper on
Seems like just days ago I blogged about Jessica Hopper and her commitment to providing restitution to customers. Since I posted that blog, there were two other settlements (which I added to that blog as updates) in which FINRA again seemed to prioritize restitution over the imposition of a fine. Yesterday, however, FINRA announced a…
The Trouble With The “Should-Have-Known” Standard, As It Applies To Red Flags
By Alan Wolper on
Last year, I wrote a piece called “Wedbush Learns That It’s Not Enough Just To Spot Red Flags.” As the title suggests, it analyzed an SEC decision in which Wedbush was sanctioned because it failed in several respects to follow up on certain red flags it saw that were indicative of potential misconduct.
I am…
SunTrust Settlement Proves That Jessica Hopper, FINRA’s Head Of Enforcement, Would Be A Good Umpire
By Alan Wolper on
I may have said this before in another post, but in my opinion, whether a baseball umpire is good or bad is not a matter of whether he has a low strikezone, a high strikezone, or a wide one. What matters is that whatever that umpire deems to be a strike vs. a ball is…
FINRA’s Concerns About Maintaining Confidentiality Seem To Be Broadening
By Alan Wolper on
I hope that, by now, everyone understands and appreciates just how freakishly sensitive the regulators are to misconduct involving the wrongful sharing of confidential information. If you don’t, however, FINRA was kind enough to publish two settlements in the last few weeks that work well to drive this concept home. And both share an interesting…
FINRA Claims To Be Reasonable When It Comes To Sanctions, But It Is Clear That Permanent Bars Are What It’s All About
By Alan Wolper on
If you are a regular reader of this blog, you know that one of my pet peeves with FINRA is its unrelenting zeal to bar people, permanently, from the securities industry. Seemingly without much regard for the actual conduct at issue, or for the existence of mitigating circumstances. It is literally a running joke in…
Can/Should FINRA Hearings Be Conducted Using Zoom?
By Alan Wolper on
I read with interest earlier this week that a judge in Texas conducted a one-day bench trial via Zoom, apparently representing the first time this has happened. I understand that hearings, i.e., matters that involve arguments of counsel, rather than the introduction of evidence through the examination of live witnesses, are often done over the…
When It Comes To Sanctions, What Does “Relevant Disciplinary History” Mean To FINRA, And Does It Vary Depending On The Size Of The Firm?
By Alan Wolper on
The day after Christmas, FINRA issued a press release announcing that five big firms – Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase, LPL, Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch – had each entered into a settlement, collectively agreeing to pay a $1.4 million fine. Their offense? They each violated FINRA’s supervisory rules because for a number of years, dating…
An Undisclosed Conflict Of Interest – By FINRA – Results In Bar Being Vacated
By Alan Wolper on
From time to time, I have lamented that FINRA does not hold itself to the same lofty standards to which it holds its members. I realize I am painting with a broad brush, as there are lots of folks at FINRA who do a great job, who are easy and reasonable to deal with, and…