Historically, one of the surest ways to get yourself permanently barred from the industry is to forge a customer’s signature on something. According to the pertinent Sanction Guideline, at a minimum, a forgery, that is, a true forgery – a signature that is neither authorized nor subsequently ratified by the customer – should result in
Enforcement
LPL AWC Proves, Once Again, That Big Firms Can Buy Their Way Out Of Trouble That Would Kill Small Firms
By UB Greensfelder on
LPL may be the biggest BD in the country, with 21,500 reps operating out of almost 13,000 branch offices. Heaven knows how much money it brings in every year, but, goodness, it must be a lot. And good thing, too, given how much the firm keeps paying to FINRA in fines for its serial, repeated,…
Another Fine Churning Mess
By UB Greensfelder on
I apologize for taking so long between posts, but, to be fair, there’s been a lot going on in the past week or so that has captured my attention! I wish everyone a happy and SAFE new year! – Alan
While undoubtedly FINRA will be issuing its annual “examination priorities” letter any day now, that…
How NOT To Supervise For Churning
By UB Greensfelder on
As should be clear to readers of this Blog, I find that Enforcement actions often provide the best guidance in terms of what regulators deem to be unacceptable conduct, which is very useful when dealing with subjective standards like “reasonableness.” This past week, FINRA published an AWC submitted by Coastal Equities, Inc. that offers a…
FINRA Zoom Hearing Goes BOOM!
By UB Greensfelder on
Attentive readers will recall that a couple of weeks ago, I mentioned in a preface to great post from Chris about expungement becoming an endangered creature due to changes in FINRA rule that I was about to embark on a two-week FINRA Enforcement hearing, all done by Zoom, by consent. I promised to provide some…
FINRA AWC Provides New Defense To Allegation Of “Willfulness”
By UB Greensfelder on
I dare you. In fact, I double-dog dare you to figure out how or why FINRA decides to charge willfulness in some cases but not in others. Bottom line is that it is nearly impossible (except if you’re a big firm, in which case you can rest easy that FINRA will manage to skip the…
The Trouble With Texts
By UB Greensfelder on
Having completed my Enforcement hearing conducted by Zoom – more about that in an upcoming post – I can finally turn my attention back to some matters that arose while I was busy.
One that stood out for the sheer (and frightening) universality of its lesson is an SEC settlement entered into by Jonestrading Institutional…
Two — No, Make That Three — FINRA AML Settlements Drive Home The Point: When It Comes To Supervision, Actions Speak Louder Than Words
By UB Greensfelder on
Right after I posted this, FINRA announced a third AML settlement, this time with Interactive Brokers. It was no small deal: it came with a $15 million fine and an obligation to retain an independent consultant. (In addition to the FINRA AWC, Interactive simultaneously entered into settlements with the SEC — with another $11.5…
FINRA ♥ Rule 8210
By UB Greensfelder on
I hope that you have had the chance to enjoy Jessica Hopper’s paean to Rule 8210 in her recent blog posted on FINRA’s website. Very disturbing, and for all the old reasons.
First, once again, she starts by patting herself – well, not just herself, I guess, but Enforcement generally – on the back for…
For FINRA, Restitution Is The Solution
By UB Greensfelder on
Seems like just days ago I blogged about Jessica Hopper and her commitment to providing restitution to customers. Since I posted that blog, there were two other settlements (which I added to that blog as updates) in which FINRA again seemed to prioritize restitution over the imposition of a fine. Yesterday, however, FINRA announced a…