For the third year, FINRA has published its now-annual (apparently) statistical accounting of its membership and the registered representatives who work for those firms. I went back and looked the blogs I posted after the 2019 report and the 2018 report, and, predictably (and somewhat sadly), the same trends continued last year as I
Wolper
Two — No, Make That Three — FINRA AML Settlements Drive Home The Point: When It Comes To Supervision, Actions Speak Louder Than Words
Right after I posted this, FINRA announced a third AML settlement, this time with Interactive Brokers. It was no small deal: it came with a $15 million fine and an obligation to retain an independent consultant. (In addition to the FINRA AWC, Interactive simultaneously entered into settlements with the SEC — with another $11.5…
FINRA ♥ Rule 8210
I hope that you have had the chance to enjoy Jessica Hopper’s paean to Rule 8210 in her recent blog posted on FINRA’s website. Very disturbing, and for all the old reasons.
First, once again, she starts by patting herself – well, not just herself, I guess, but Enforcement generally – on the back for…
Goodbye Suitability, Hello Best Interest. But What Does That Mean, Practically Speaking?
After having proudly served for decades, and surviving a dramatic face-lift in 2012 (when old NASD Rule 2310 was replaced by shiny new FINRA Rule 2111), it seems that the “suitability rule,” as we’ve come to know it, has, at long last, been quietly sent out to pasture by FINRA. Although the title of Reg…
What Do You Call A Nominating Committee That Doesn’t Actually Nominate Anyone? A FINRA Nominating Committee
This will be a quick one, but I just had to get something off my chest before the weekend. As you probably know, there is an election upcoming. No, not that one, the one to elect certain members of FINRA’s Board of Governors. That Board consists of 24 members, as follows:
- Robert Cook, who is
…
More Thoughts On Hold Recommendations In A Reg BI World
I have blogged before about hold recommendations. Surprisingly – at least to me – the statistics I get from the publisher of this blog reveal that more people have read that particular post than anything else I have written since I started this thing a few years ago. That has to mean something, right? …
For FINRA, Restitution Is The Solution
Seems like just days ago I blogged about Jessica Hopper and her commitment to providing restitution to customers. Since I posted that blog, there were two other settlements (which I added to that blog as updates) in which FINRA again seemed to prioritize restitution over the imposition of a fine. Yesterday, however, FINRA announced a…
FINRA’s New MAP Rules Put Customers’ Interests Ahead Of Everything, Including Logic
Two years ago, when it was just an ugly rule proposal, I blogged about FINRA’s intent to modify its MAP rules to “Incentivize Payment of Arbitration Awards.” Sadly, FINRA once again showed it spinelessness by pushing these rule amendments through, ignoring the concerns of its own member firms. They are now not just rule proposals,…
The Trouble With The “Should-Have-Known” Standard, As It Applies To Red Flags
Last year, I wrote a piece called “Wedbush Learns That It’s Not Enough Just To Spot Red Flags.” As the title suggests, it analyzed an SEC decision in which Wedbush was sanctioned because it failed in several respects to follow up on certain red flags it saw that were indicative of potential misconduct.
I am…
SunTrust Settlement Proves That Jessica Hopper, FINRA’s Head Of Enforcement, Would Be A Good Umpire
I may have said this before in another post, but in my opinion, whether a baseball umpire is good or bad is not a matter of whether he has a low strikezone, a high strikezone, or a wide one. What matters is that whatever that umpire deems to be a strike vs. a ball is…