For many years, FINRA has attempted in several settings to substitute objective criteria for subjective ones, to try and make things easier for itself, and to make things more consistent from district to district and from firm to firm. For instance, FINRA used to – and may still today – identify firms whose exam cycles
appeal
Another Day, Another Complaint About The Unlevel Playing Field In FINRA Arbitrations
I just read this article – admittedly authored by lawyers, Ethan Brecher and Ana Montoya, whose website provides that one of their three principal areas of practice is representing investors “who have been defrauded by their securities brokers”[1] – that advocates for a new FINRA rule designed “to limit wasteful post-arbitration appeals by brokerage…
Beyond Lucia: The Supreme Court’s Decision Is Just the Beginning
Here is an important post by my partner, Ken Berg, regarding SEC administrative proceedings, and what we can expect following the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia. – Alan
By now everyone knows the US Supreme Court declared the SEC’s administrative proceedings unconstitutional because the ALJs were improperly hired by the SEC staff instead of…
Article II Appointments Clause Defense To SEC Administrative Actions Gains Momentum In The Courts
Here is Part II of Ken Berg’s analysis of constitutional defenses that have been raised in response to the SEC’s increased use of administrative proceedings. In the interest of full disclosure, note that the Malouf case referenced towards the end is one that Heidi VonderHeide and I are handling. In addition, it also worth mentioning…
Looking For A Silver Lining: Post-Election Thoughts On The SEC
Wednesday morning marked the confluence of two events. First, like the rest of the world, I awoke to the reality of the results of the presidential race. Then, as soon as I got to the office, I received the results of a case (on which I have previously blogged) that the SEC’s Division of…
Updates: Two Losers + One Positive Note = A Bad Week For Broker-Dealers
There have been some developments this week in a few matters on which I have previously offered my views. To help you stay on the cutting edge of financial world current events as you mingle at your upcoming Cinco de Mayo fiestas, here are three updates. Two, not surprisingly, represent wins for the regulators. The…
The First Circuit Makes The Case Against Cherry-Picking Instances Of Alleged Misrepresentations By Focusing, Instead, On “Context”
Years ago, I handled the defense of a FINRA Enforcement case that still galls me. The client sent a series of emails, over many months, about a particular security to customers who already owned the stock. The point of the emails was largely to provide updates, and, from time-to-time, to suggest that the customers consider…
The SEC’s Proposal To Improve The Fairness Of Administrative Proceedings: Not Nearly Enough To Impact Its Winning Percentage, But Enough To Make It Seem It Cares
In what many will likely consider to be an effort to quiet the increasing chorus of criticism over the SEC’s increased use of administrative proceedings over the last few years, today, the SEC announced a proposal to amend several of the rules governing those proceedings. While the SEC did not expressly acknowledge that the amendments…
Compliance Officer Liability: Findings Without Sanctions? The Plot Thickens
We have previously posted on the issue of CCO liability, a very sensitive subject, to say the least, for many readers of this blog. If this is a subject that interests you, then there was a very intriguing development this past week in this area that merits your attention.
It came in the form of…
David Slays Goliath…And Goliath Is Pissed
I reported a few weeks ago on the victory that my clients, Mark Robare and Jack Jones, achieved in the administrative proceeding that the SEC initiated against them last year. Against all odds, they convinced Judge Grimes that not only had they not committed the fraud claimed by the SEC, but, in Judge Grimes’ words,…