Last week, word spread about a legal challenge that has been mounted in federal court against FINRA’s ability to enforce violations of the Securities Act of 1933, and, perhaps not surprisingly, it has generated a lot of talk, not to mention enthusiasm (at least among those who chafe at FINRA’s aggressive Enforcement mentality). The specifics
Enforcement
A Miscellany Of FINRA Issues A Little Too Big To Call Nitpicking
For some reason, a bunch of noteworthy events all happened around the same time this week, so please bear with me as I vent a little about them. Individually, they are irritating; in the aggregate, they are borderline alarming.
First, the FINRA Wells process. I have blogged about this before, and how, in a…
The First Circuit Makes The Case Against Cherry-Picking Instances Of Alleged Misrepresentations By Focusing, Instead, On “Context”
Years ago, I handled the defense of a FINRA Enforcement case that still galls me. The client sent a series of emails, over many months, about a particular security to customers who already owned the stock. The point of the emails was largely to provide updates, and, from time-to-time, to suggest that the customers consider…
What In The Wells Is Going On With FINRA’s “Wells” Process?
With any luck, you can go your entire career in the securities industry without ever participating in the dreaded “Wells process.” And that’s a good thing, as the Wells process occurs only after FINRA has completed an examination and has concluded that whatever it has encountered is so serious that a formal disciplinary action is…
(Another) Landslide Victory: FINRA Enforcement Offers ZERO Evidence Of Fraud
At the end of last week, we received our second[1] decisive win in a FINRA Enforcement case in a matter of days. Following a two-day hearing back in July, the hearing Panel dismissed all charges against our clients Paul J. McIntyre and MSC-BD, LLC. While any victory is nice, and doing justice for a…
Nobody’s Perfect (And Even FINRA Finally Acknowledged It)
Fans of this blog (or, at least, readers of this blog who are fans of Jeopardy) will no doubt remember Alan’s prior post, published a few weeks ago, and discussing a recent case that FINRA’s Department of Enforcement brought against one of our clients. From the very beginning, we, as her counsel, were both…
The Ongoing Puzzle Of Ongoing Due Diligence
I am currently in the midst of a FINRA examination that is largely focused on the adequacy of the due diligence that my broker-dealer client conducted of a private placement. What is puzzling about the exam is that FINRA is not just interested in the due diligence that was conducted prior to effecting any sales…
Double Jeopardy: I’ll Take “Fundamental Unfairness” for $200, Alex
I have written before about some of FINRA’s procedural processes that seem strange and unfair. For instance, the constitutionally guaranteed Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination? Doesn’t exist in FINRA world. Try invoking the Fifth at a FINRA OTR rather than answering a question and you will be facing a permanent bar for violating Rule 8210.…
Compliance Officer Liability: Findings Without Sanctions? The Plot Thickens
We have previously posted on the issue of CCO liability, a very sensitive subject, to say the least, for many readers of this blog. If this is a subject that interests you, then there was a very intriguing development this past week in this area that merits your attention.
It came in the form of…
If You’re a Respondent, Time is NOT on Your Side
There was a decision this week from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on an appeal of a decision by a respondent who – stop the presses! – lost an SEC administrative proceeding, and then lost his appeal to the SEC. Montford and Company, Inc. v. SEC, No. 14-1126 (July 10, 2015). One of…