Many industry authors – including me[1] – have devoted a lot of attention lately to the SEC’s increased use of Administrative Proceedings (rather than Federal court cases) in recent years, and questioned the fairness of such proceedings, given their relative lack of discovery tools, the short timeframe provided within which to prepare a case
disciplinary action
Swing And A Miss: A Rare Form U-4 Loss For FINRA
By UB Greensfelder on
I have blogged multiple times, as recently as a couple of weeks ago, about the slew of Enforcement actions that FINRA has brought for an RR’s failure to update his or her Form U-4 in a timely manner to disclose a tax lien. My partner, Michael Gross, examines one such case that FINRA managed to…
Statutorily Disqualified? FINRA Says “Deal With It”
By UB Greensfelder on
It is a nasty thing when one becomes statutorily disqualified. It means either leaving the industry, permanently, or having to file an MC-400 and trying to convince FINRA that you should be permitted to remain in the industry, albeit subject to heightened supervision and extra scrutiny from FINRA. I have previously blogged about statutory disqualification,…
Looking For A Silver Lining: Post-Election Thoughts On The SEC
By UB Greensfelder on
Wednesday morning marked the confluence of two events. First, like the rest of the world, I awoke to the reality of the results of the presidential race. Then, as soon as I got to the office, I received the results of a case (on which I have previously blogged) that the SEC’s Division of…
When It Comes To Churning, FINRA Knows What’s Best For Investors
By UB Greensfelder on
Since I first started practicing law back in the 1980s, customer complaints against brokers have often involved allegations of “churning,” which is deemed to be fraud. Now, as it was 30+ years ago, to prove a churning claim, a customer needs to demonstrate that (1) the broker acted with scienter, which is defined to…
Frequently Asked Questions About FINRA Rule 8210
By UB Greensfelder on
As readers of this Blog know, Rule 8210 is a favorite subject of mine to complain about, particularly the frightening vigor with which FINRA constantly tests the limits of the rule. What follows are some very helpful FAQs about Rule 8210 from Michael Gross. – Alan
The Scope of the Rule
Can FINRA really ask…
A Settlement Agreement With FINRA (Or So You Thought)
By UB Greensfelder on
In OHO Order 16-26, a Hearing Officer confirmed what those uninitiated to FINRA’s disciplinary process likely would not even suspect: an agreement to settle a FINRA regulatory matter on terms proposed by FINRA’s Department of Enforcement is not necessarily an enforceable agreement.
In this case, the respondent argued that FINRA should be estopped from…
The Math of Mark-Ups/Downs
By UB Greensfelder on
I am pleased to welcome a new author to Broker-Dealer Law Corner, my partner in Ulmer’s Boca Raton office, Michael Gross. Like myself, Michael returned to private practice after a stint at FINRA, specifically, with the Department of Enforcement, where he handled big, litigated cases all over the US. There is no substitute for the…
Advertising Case Loss Reveals Limits To FINRA’s Jurisdiction Over Outside Business Activities
By UB Greensfelder on
It is a simple fact that a broker-dealer has no obligation to supervise a disclosed outside business activity. How do I know? FINRA has said so. This, for instance, comes straight from Reg Notice 05-50: “Rule 3030 does not require that the firm supervise or even approve an outside business activity, although a…
Procedural Motions In FINRA Enforcement Actions: An Exercise In Futility
By UB Greensfelder on
Defending a FINRA Enforcement action is not easy. This stems principally from the fact that FINRA simply won’t file a complaint in the first place if they believe that there’s any realistic chance they will not win the case. Thus, they expect to win every time they do file a complaint, and perhaps not unreasonably…